Census Designated Places and Incorporated Places in Texas: A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Sally Caldwell

Keywords:

Census Designated Place (CDP), incorporated places, demographic comparison, Texas

Abstract

This article presents the results of an exploratory demographic comparison of

Author Biography

  • Sally Caldwell

    Department of Sociology

    Texas State University


    San Marcos, TX 78666

References

Chapin, Jr., F. S., and E. J. Kaiser. 1979. Urban Land Use Planning. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Glaser, E. L., and J. L. Vigdor. 2003. Racial Segregation: Promising News. In Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, B. Katz and R. E. Lang (eds.), 211

Lang, R. E., and D. Dhavale. 2003. Reluctant Cities? Exploring Big Unincorporated Census Designated Places. Fannie Mae Foundation and Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech Census Note Series 03: 01.

Lang, R. E., and P. A. Simmons. 2001. "Boomburbs"

Sutton, P. D., and F. A. Day. 2004. Types of Rapidly Growing Counties of the U.S., 1970

Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer. Census 2000 Demographic Profiles 2

U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Geographic Area Reference Manual Chapter 9. http://census.gov/geo/www/garm.html.

Downloads

Published

2005-01-01

Issue

Vol. 8 (2004)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).