Assessing Aerial Imagery Interpretation of High School Students with Eye -Movement Analysis
Keywords:
Spatial Learning, Aerial Imagery Interpretation, Eye-Movement Analysis, Geovisualization, Geographic EducationAbstract
The successful development of spatial thinking and map interpretation
References
Antes, James R., Kang-tsung Chang, and Chad Mullis. 1985. The visual effect of map design: An eye-movement analysis. The American Cartographer 12(2):143-155.
Aretz, Anthony J. 1991. The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors 33:85-101.
Baker, Thomas R. 2005. Internet-based GIS mapping in support of K-12 education. Professional Geographer 57(1):44-50.
Bednarz, Sarah W., and Richard H. Audet. 1999. The status of GIS technology in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Geography 98(2):60-67.
Brodersen, L., H. H. K. Andersen, and S. Weber. 2001. Applying Eyemovement Tracking for the Study of Map Perception and Map Design.
Publication series 4(9). National Survey and Cadastre, Copenhagen: Kort and Matrikelstyrelsen.
Castner, Henry W., and J. Ronald Eastman. 1984. Eye-movement parameters and perceived map complexity
Castner, Henry W., and J. Ronald Eastman. 1985. Eye-movement parametersand perceived map complexity
Committee on the Support for Thinking Spatially. 2006. Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Deadman, P., G. B. Hall, T. Bain, L. Elliot, and D. Dudycha. 2000. Interactive GIS instruction using a multimedia classroom. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24(3):365-380.
Dent, B. D. 1972. Visual organization and thematic map communications. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 62(1):79-93.
De Lucio, J. V., M. Mohamadian, J. P. Ruiz, J. Banayas, and F. G. Bernaldez. 1996. Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking. Landscape and Urban Planning 34(2):135-142.
Dobson, Michael W. 1977. Eye movement parameters and map reading. American Cartographer 4(1):39-58.
Dobson, Michael W. 1979. The influence of map information on fixation localization. American Cartographer 6(1):51-65.
Eastman, J. Ronald. 1977. Map complexity: An information processing approach. M. A. thesis: Boston University.
Fabrikant S. I., S. Rebich-Hespanha, N. Andrienko, G. Andrienko, and D. R. Montello. 2008. Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes. The Cartographic Journal 45(3):201
Fisher, P., J. Dykes, and J. Wood. 1993. Map design and visualization. The Cartographic Journal 30(2):136-142.
Gatrell, J. D. 2004. Making room: Integrating geo-technologies into teacher education. Journal of Geography 10(5):193-198.
Geography Education Standards Project. 1994. Geography for Life: National Geography Standards 1994. Washington D.C.: National Geographic Society Committee on Research and Exploration.
Gratzer, Milkos A., and Robert D. McDowell. 1971. Adaptation of an eye movement recorder to esthetic environmental mensuration. Research Report No. 36, Storrs, CT. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station: University of Connecticut.
Jenny, B., H. Jenny, and S. Raber. 2008. Map design for the Internet. In International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet, ed. M. P. Peterson, 31-48. New York: Springer.
Kerski, Joseph J. 2003. The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography 102(3):128-137.
Kraak, M. J. 1993. Three-dimensional map design. The Cartographic Journal 30(2):188-194.
Kulhavy, Raymond W., N. H. Schwartz, and S. H. Shaha. 1982. Interpretive framework and memory for map features. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 9(2):141-147.
Lobben, Amy K. 2004. Tasks, strategies, and cognitive processes associated with navigational map reading: A review perspective. Professional Geographer 56(2):270-281.
Longley, Paul A., Michael F. Goodchild, David J. Maguire, and David W. Rhind. 2005. Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Mackworth, Norman H., and A. J. Morandi. 1967. The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 2(11):547-552.
Maguire, M. 2001. Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55:587-634.
Meyer, Judith W., Jon Butterick, Michael Olkin, and George Zack. 1999. GIS in the K-12 curriculum: A cautionary note. Professional Geographer 51(4):571-578.
Milson, Andrew J., and Brian D. Earle. 2007. Internet-based GIS in an inductive learning environment: A case study of ninth-grade geography students. Journal of Geography 106(6):227-237.
Montello, Daniel R. and R. Golledge. 1999. Scale and detail in cognition of geographic information. Report of the Specialist Meeting of Project Varenius, May 14-16: Santa Barbara, CA.
Montello, Daniel R. 2009. Cognitive research in GIScience: Recent achievements and future prospects. Geography Compass 3(5): 1824-1840.
Montello, Daniel R. 2002. Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: Theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29(3):283-304.
Nellis, M. D. 1994. Technology in geographic education: Reflections and future directions. Journal of Geography 93(1):36-39.
Nguyen, A., V. Chandran, and S. Sridharan. 2005. Gaze tracking for region of interest coding in JPEG 2000: Signal Processing. Image Communication 21(5):359-377.
Patterson, Todd C. 2007. Google Earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography 106(4):145-152.
Pedersen, Paula, Pat Farrell, and Eric McPhee. 2005. Paper versus pixel: Effectiveness of paper versus electronic maps to teach map reading skills in an introductory physical geography course. Journal of Geography 104(5):195-202.
Podell, D. M., S. Kaminsky, and V. Cusimano. 1994. The effects of microcomputer laboratory approach to physical science instruction on student motivation. Computers in the Schools 9(2/3):65-74.
Rajashekar, U., L. K. Cormack, and A. C. Bovik. 2004. Point of gaze analysis reveals visual search strategies. In Proceedings of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, eds. B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, 296-306. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
Rossano, Matt J., and S. L. Hodgson. 1994. The process of learning from small-scale maps. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8(6):565-582.
Rossano, Matt J., and Timothy T. Morrison. 1996. Learning from maps: General processes and map-structure influences. Cognition & Instruction 14 (1):109-137.
Siegel, A. W., and S. H. White. 1975. The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 10:9-55.
Slocum, T. A., C. Block, B. Jiang, A. Koussoulakou, D. R. Montello, S. Fuhrmann, and N. R. Hedley. 2001. Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(1):61-75.
Steinke, Theodore R. 1987. Eye movement studies in cartography and related fields. Cartographica 24(2):40-73.
Taylor, J. S. 2000. Using the World Wide Web in Undergraduate geographic education: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Geography 99(1):11-22.
Verdi, Michael P., and Raymond W. Kulhavy. 2002. Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review 14(1):27-46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).